Cover: Watergate and Television: An Economic Analysis.

Watergate and Television: An Economic Analysis.

Published 1975

by Stanley Besen, Bridger M. Mitchell

Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback40 pages $20.00

It has been suggested that the total U.S. television audience is independent of the number and variety of programs available for viewing and that thus new sources of television programming will obtain their audiences from existing viewers rather than from the ranks of nonviewers. Because the televised coverage of the Senate Watergate hearings was first shown simultaneously by all three networks and then by the networks on a rotating basis, the audience data during this period of expanded programming choices are uniquely suited to testing theories of viewer choice. The data reveal a substantial increase in total viewing when the range of programming is increased. New sources of programming, such as that produced for public broadcasting and cable television, need not grow solely at the expense of audience for existing fare, but would be capable of expanding total viewing if they provide material sufficiently different from that now being broadcast. 40 pp.

This report is part of the RAND report series. The report was a product of RAND from 1948 to 1993 that represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.