Download

Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 1.8 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

Purchase

Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback64 pages $20.00 $16.00 20% Web Discount

One of a series of reports exploring the sources of black/white income differentials. Employment quotas--affirmative action in the extreme--are used as an analytical device to derive a priori notions of the effects of government attempts to reduce employment discrimination. When rigorously enforced, employment quotas create economic shortages of workers designated by quotas that otherwise would not exist. Such quotas generate wage premiums for those the quota forces to be in short supply, and, concurrently, they create rationing problems. This report explores in depth only one solution to the rationing problem, but sketches qualitative implications of other alternatives. The solution consists of skill bumping or promoting unskilled minority workers to skilled job classes. The author concludes that quota effects without skill bumping--when quotas are rigorously enforced and rationing problems are not resolved--can differ radically from effects of quotas with skill bumping. (See also R-1666.)

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Report series. The report was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 1993 that represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.

Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.