The Census Occupational Taxonomy: How Much Information Does It Contain?

Finis Welch, Iva S. Maclennan

ResearchPublished 1976

Concludes that, judged on the basis of wage and job status information, most of the detail contained in the 297 occupational codes used in 1960 and expanded to 443 for the 1970 Census is irrelevant. To explore efficiencies achievable through reclassification, the authors adopt a quadratic function--a second-order approximation to more general functions--as a measure of the information lost with aggregation. In fact, the authors use two indexes, weekly wages and socioeconomic status, as scalar measures of information, taking the existing detailed codes as the point of departure. Fully 98 percent of the variance explained with 298 codes is retained after aggregation to only nine groups. As a first step in a search for efficient taxonomies, the authors present a simple quality index to be used for judging alternative aggregation schemes when criteria other than wages and socioeconomic status are added. (See also R-1666.) 36 pp. Bibliog.

Order a Print Copy

Format
Paperback
Page count
36 pages
List Price
$20.00
Buy link
Add to Cart

Document Details

  • Availability: Available
  • Year: 1976
  • Print Format: Paperback
  • Paperback Pages: 36
  • Paperback Price: $20.00
  • Document Number: R-1849-HEW/DOL

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Welch, Finis and Iva S. Maclennan, The Census Occupational Taxonomy: How Much Information Does It Contain? RAND Corporation, R-1849-HEW/DOL, 1976. As of September 23, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/reports/R1849.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Welch, Finis and Iva S. Maclennan, The Census Occupational Taxonomy: How Much Information Does It Contain? Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1976. https://www.rand.org/pubs/reports/R1849.html. Also available in print form.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND report series. The report series, a product of RAND from 1948 to 1993, represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.