The Effect of State of Residence on Medical School Admissions

by John E. Rolph, Albert P. Williams, C. Lee

Download

Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 2.5 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

Purchase

Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback80 pages $20.00 $16.00 20% Web Discount

Data on medical school applications for 1972, 1973, 1974, and 1975 are used to develop discriminant functions which weight applicant characteristics (undergraduate GPA, MCAT, state of residence, etc.) according to their effects on an applicant's likelihood of being admitted to at least one U.S. medical school. State of residence effects are particularly strong for majority applicants. For example, an average white applicant from California would have a .13 probability of being admitted to some medical school; the same applicant from South Dakota would have a .81 probability of being admitted. The supply of physicians and the number of public and private medical school places in relation to a state's population account for most of the state of residence effects on admission odds.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Report series. The report was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 1993 that represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.