Research
Quality of Medical Care Assessment Using Outcome Measures: Eight Disease-Specific Applications
Jan 1, 1976
An Overview of the Method
ResearchPublished 1976
First in a series of three volumes, this report reviews the current state of the art of assessing the quality of medical care using the outcome method and describes in detail the approach taken during this year-long RAND research project to select outcome criteria and develop short-term, disease-specific outcome standards for eight disease conditions or surgical procedures: asthma in children and adults; breast mass and breast cancer; cholecystectomy; diarrhea and dehydration in children; ischemic heart disease; osteoarthrosis; otitis media in children; and tonsillectomy with and without adenoidectomy. Standards were developed by panels of physicians representing a variety of medical and surgical specialties and geographic areas. Although outcome measures have more face validity than do structure or process variables, the validity, reliability, and feasibility of the outcome approach are not assured. Recommendations are made for further testing of the standards developed and for additional research on the outcome method.
This publication is part of the RAND report series. The report series, a product of RAND from 1948 to 1993, represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.