Copyright Liability for Cable Television
Is Compulsory Licensing the Solution?
ResearchPublished 1977
Is Compulsory Licensing the Solution?
ResearchPublished 1977
Analyzes the historical background and the economic issues leading to the General Revision of the Copyright Act, which provides a compulsory license instead of full copyright liability. This license permits cable systems to carry those signals currently authorized for retransmission by the Federal Communications Commission upon payment of a specified percentage of revenues. The basic thesis of this report is that the adoption of compulsory licensing will aggravate the problems associated with distant signal importation. (1) A compulsory license is less efficient than full liability because the consumers' willingness to pay for programs is perceived only indirectly by program suppliers. (2) The lack of specificity in the guidelines for allocating the compulsory license fees among suppliers can only aggravate their revenue problems. (3) Whereas full liability would have provided a more enduring resolution of the copyright liability for cable, the General Revision provides only a temporary solution.
This publication is part of the RAND report series. The report series, a product of RAND from 1948 to 1993, represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.