Informational Equilibrium.
ResearchPublished 1977
ResearchPublished 1977
If buyers are less well-informed about product quality than sellers, and no additional information is available, market clearing prices must reflect some weighted average of product quality. Then if potential sellers of the highest quality products have the greatest opportunity costs and these costs exceed price, they will not enter the market. This "adverse selection" phenomenon is, however, offset if sellers of higher quality products can adopt sales-related activities that operate as a "signal" to potential buyers. These "informational equilibria" in which signaling is needed to distinguish product quality do not have the stability properties of classical Walrasian equilibria. It is shown that if product quality varies continuously across sellers, there is no informationally consistent set of prices and signals that is a Nash equilibrium set. An alternative noncooperative equilibrium concept is introduced and defended as a plausible imperfectly competitive equilibrium. It is then demonstrated that among the many informationally consistent sets of price-signal pairs, there is a unique "reactive equilibrium." 49 pp. Ref.
This publication is part of the RAND report series. The report series, a product of RAND from 1948 to 1993, represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.