Alternative Institutional Arrangements for Developing and Commercializing Breeder Reactor Technology.
ResearchPublished 1976
ResearchPublished 1976
Assesses nine institutional arrangements, ranging from heavy private sector initiative to complete government ownership and control, for developing liquid metal fast breeder reactor (LMFBR) technology beyond the Clinch River Breeder Reactor project (CRBR). Private sector involvement in the CRBR demonstration plant, scheduled for construction in 1977, has been quite limited. If LMFBR commercialization is to be the goal, the most promising arrangements have the government contributing a fixed sum to make the estimated cost of an early breeder plant roughly equal to that of the next best alternative, with a consortium of utilities sharing the open-ended risks and costs, and with one utility assuming the lead role. The emergence of one or more qualified takers would indicate that the private sector is prepared for commercialization; if there were no qualified takers, or if large additional commitments were sought from the government, a major reevaluation of the breeder program should be conducted. 174 pp. Bibliog.
This publication is part of the RAND report series. The report series, a product of RAND from 1948 to 1993, represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.