Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 1.3 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.


Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback66 pages $20.00 $16.00 20% Web Discount

The asymptotic solution of flow near the entrance of a heated straight pipe is obtained by perturbing the solution of flow in an unheated straight pipe. Two vortices result from motions of fluid particles induced by displacement of the boundary layer. The axial velocity has a concave profile and grows toward a uniform profile downstream. The downward stream caused by displacement of secondary boundary layer forces the axial velocity profile counterclockwise if the flow is from left to right. A favorable pressure gradient is generated on the bottom wall; an unfavorable pressure gradient is induced on the top wall. The results were applied to the "Colorado tube test" set. It was found that when the flow speed is not fast enough, strong wall heating can cause the boundary-layer flow to separate from the top wall of the pipe, causing transition to turbulence; in this case, the flow cannot be used to simulate an external boundary-layer flow.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Report series. The report was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 1993 that represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.