Cover: AFDC Caseload and the Job Market in California

AFDC Caseload and the Job Market in California

Selected Issues

Published 1977

by Allan Abrahamse, David M. De Ferranti, Patricia D. Fleischauer, Albert J. Lipson

Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback184 pages $35.00

An examination of selected issues concerning the dependence of California’s AFDC (Aid to Families with Dependent Children) caseload on economic conditions. Questions considered include: Which sectors of the economy do most recipients come from and go to? Do certain sectors influence the size and composition of the caseload appreciably more than other sectors do? How employable are recipients, considering their family situations, experience, skills, educational attainment, etc.? The types of work recipients do before, during, and after being on AFDC are considered, as well as their skill level and wage. Recipients’ work histories, family composition, schooling, training, and demographic characteristics are surveyed. Findings are based principally on the Department of Benefit Payment 1973 Work History Survey and U.S. Census Bureau, HEW, and state surveys for 1966-1975.

This report is part of the RAND report series. The report was a product of RAND from 1948 to 1993 that represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.