Cover: A Study of Alternatives in American Education

A Study of Alternatives in American Education

Vol. VI, Student Outcomes at Alum Rock 1974-1976

Published 1981

by Frank J. Capell, Lynn Doscher


Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 4.3 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.


Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback123 pages $35.00

Analyzes student outcomes in Alum Rock, California, to determine how educational alternatives may affect them. Using student reading achievement as the cognitive outcome, and social, self, and peer perceptions as the non-cognitive outcomes, the study found no appreciable differences in outcomes between alternative and regular schools. This finding implies that districts should consider community needs or public policy — not the possible effect on outcomes — as the rationale for implementing alternatives. Of the alternative-program features studied, only teachers' perceptions significantly affected reading achievement. Higher reading achievement was associated with programs whose teachers perceived themselves as a cohesive staff, adhering to common policies, and actively involved with the principal. Within programs, it was associated with classrooms whose teachers perceived themselves as having greater autonomy and influence than their colleagues. Thus, districts should consider possible tradeoffs between cohesiveness and autonomy when implementing programs and placing teachers.

This report is part of the RAND report series. The report was a product of RAND from 1948 to 1993 that represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.