Peacetime Adequacy of the Lower Tiers of the Defense Industrial Base
ResearchPublished 1977
ResearchPublished 1977
Have the lower tiers of the U.S. domestic defense industrial base — that is, the subcontractors and suppliers — become inadequate to meet the needs of the Department of Defense (DOD)? This study examines the issue of lower-tier peacetime adequacy in terms of (1) the possibility of too few suppliers; (2) the ways in which the conduct of DOD business may be influencing suppliers to leave or stay in government business; (3) how DOD buying practices affect the efficiency of weapon systems acquisition; and (4) how the DOD, Congress, and courts interact in policymaking decisions that affect the adequacy and efficiency of the lower tiers. To compile data for the analysis, 13 system program offices were surveyed at two Air Force product divisions: Aeronautical Systems Division and the Space and Missile Systems Organization. Four communication satellite programs, two missile programs, and seven aircraft programs were included in the study. Based on the results of the survey, the authors conclude that fears about peacetime erosion of the industrial base are largely unfounded, but some buying practices do increase costs.
This publication is part of the RAND report series. The report series, a product of RAND from 1948 to 1993, represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.