Cover: Nuclear Reactor Spent Fuel Valuation: Procedure, Applications, and Analysis.

Nuclear Reactor Spent Fuel Valuation: Procedure, Applications, and Analysis.

Published 1978

by Kenneth A. Solomon

Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback43 pages $20.00

Description of a procedure to estimate the net present discounted value (PDV) of the benefit incurred when the reprocessed plutonium and uranium contained in spent fuel are recycled, less the PDV of the stream of costs to transport, store, and reprocess the spent fuel and to fabricate, store, and safeguard the new mixed oxide fuel. The present value of spent fuel is highly sensitive to uncertainty in such important factors as yellowcake prices, reprocessing costs, and discount rates. The valuation of spent fuel will arise in the implementation of U.S. policies to reduce the potential for proliferation of nuclear weapons by delaying or restricting the reprocessing of spent fuel from light water reactors. The valuation procedure is applied to selected spent fuel scenarios, and the impact is assessed of the different assumptions likely to be made by interested parties on the resulting values of spent fuel. 43 pp. Ref.

This report is part of the RAND report series. The report was a product of RAND from 1948 to 1993 that represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.