Cover: Estimating the autocorrelated error model with trended data

Estimating the autocorrelated error model with trended data

Published 1978

by Rolla Edward Park, Bridger M. Mitchell

Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback32 pages $20.00

The time-series model with first-order autocorrelation arises in a wide variety of econometric applications. This report compares the relative efficiencies of seven estimators of the structural coefficients beta in samples of 20 and 50 observations and assesses the performance of the conventionally used variance statistics for testing hypotheses when the independent variables contain a trend. The estimators compared are (1) ordinary least squares (OLS), (2) Cochrane-Orcutt (C-O), (3) feasible C-O (using the estimated autocorrelation coefficient rho), (4) generalized least squares (GLS), (5) feasible GLS, (6) first difference (FD), and (7) FD with an estimated intercept. As a practical guide, it is recommended (1) not to use the C-O estimator, (2) to use feasible GLS for important problems, (3) to use FD only when it is known that high autocorrelation is present, and (4) to distrust [t]-statistics and apply substantially higher confidence levels for testing hypotheses.

This report is part of the RAND report series. The report was a product of RAND from 1948 to 1993 that represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.