Race Differences in Earnings: A Survey and New Evidence.
ResearchPublished 1978
Explores five possible explanations for the recent convergence in black-white earnings ratios: (1) a convergence in black and white income-producing characteristics; (2) a cohort or "vintage" improvement among blacks; (3) the effects of migration; (4) the effects of government affirmative action and reduction in labor market discrimination; and (5) business cycle variation. The principal explanation given here for the improved economic status of blacks is that successive cohorts of blacks and whites are simply becoming more alike in those attributes producing higher wages. The report is based on a statistical analysis of eight Current Population Surveys for 1968 through 1975, each dataset containing approximately 40,000 people. Thus eight successive cross-sections are used to distinguish cohort and life cycle effects. The weight of evidence supports cohort improvement rather than the life cycle view. 69 pp. Bibliog.
Document Details
- Copyright: RAND Corporation
- Availability: Web Only
- Year: 1978
- Pages: 69
- Document Number: R-2295-NSF
Citation
RAND Style Manual
Chicago Manual of Style
This publication is part of the RAND report series. The report series, a product of RAND from 1948 to 1993, represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.