Civilian Earnings of Military Retirees

Patricia Munch Danzon

ResearchPublished 1980

Presents evidence on the civilian earnings of military retirees relative to those of noncareer veterans, with data from the 1970 Census to provide some empirical evidence on the extent of second career earnings loss of military retirees. A commonly cited rationale for the military pension is that skills acquired in the military are not fully transferable to the civilian sector. True second career earnings loss is necessarily unobservable. Veteran status was imputed to retiree and noncareer veterans on the basis of their ages and the conflicts in which they served. On average, weekly wage rates of retirees are 10 to 20 percent lower than weekly wages of noncareer veterans. Roughly half the white retiree differential in annual earnings is estimated to be attributable to voluntarily chosen characteristics, such as years of schooling, hours of work, and location. The residual earnings differential of less than 10 percent is probably an upper bound on true second career earnings loss.

Order a Print Copy

Format
Paperback
Page count
52 pages
List Price
$23.00
Buy link
Add to Cart

Document Details

  • Availability: Available
  • Year: 1980
  • Print Format: Paperback
  • Paperback Pages: 52
  • Paperback Price: $23.00
  • Paperback ISBN/EAN: 978-0-8330-0238-9
  • Document Number: R-2353-MRAL

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Danzon, Patricia Munch, Civilian Earnings of Military Retirees, RAND Corporation, R-2353-MRAL, 1980. As of September 5, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/reports/R2353.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Danzon, Patricia Munch, Civilian Earnings of Military Retirees. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1980. https://www.rand.org/pubs/reports/R2353.html. Also available in print form.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND report series. The report series, a product of RAND from 1948 to 1993, represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.