The PSRO and the nursing home. Vol. 1, An assessment of PSRO long-term care review
ResearchPublished 1979
ResearchPublished 1979
Ten Professional Standards Review Organization (PSRO) demonstration projects in long-term care (LTC) review developed and tested LTC review methods. A multidisciplinary RAND team assessed the demonstration effort. Methods included analyses of written materials; site visits; and interviews with PSRO personnel and board members, state officials, nursing home representatives, and other interested parties. A substudy of 227 telephone interviews provided information from the (largely positive) perspective of the LTC facility. The projects used the demonstration period to develop review staff, physician committees, criteria for the need for care at the skilled and intermediate level, criteria for quality of care assessment, and relationships with state officials and local nursing homes. The PSROs were able to demonstrate similar deficiencies in care quality at each site. Assessment methods leave much to be desired but the demonstration work has advanced the field. The promising beginning makes it imperative to preserve an incentive for PSROs to enter the LTC review field.
This publication is part of the RAND report series. The report series, a product of RAND from 1948 to 1993, represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.