Cover: Distance estimation from cognitive maps

Distance estimation from cognitive maps

Published 1979

by Perry W. Thorndyke

Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback38 pages $20.00

Four experiments investigated map clutter as a source of distortion in distance estimates. In Experiments 1 and 2, subjects estimated distances between pairs of points on a memorized map. In Experiment 1, subjects learned relative distances among cities incidentally; in Experiment 2, they learned them intentionally. In both experiments, estimates increased as a linear function of the number of intervening points along the path. In Experiment 3, subjects estimated distances while viewing the map. The clutter effect was reduced but not eliminated. In Experiment 4, the clutter effect was demonstrated using subjects' pre-experimental knowledge of U.S. geography. Psychophysical power functions relating true to estimated distance provided a good fit to both memory and preception data. These results suggest in analogy between perceptual and memorial processes of distance estimation. The model providing the best fit to the data assumed that subjects perceptually scan a route from start to destination and use scan duration to determine path distance.

This report is part of the RAND report series. The report was a product of RAND from 1948 to 1993 that represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.