Lessons to be Learned from the Los Angeles Rate Experiment in Electricity
Jan 1, 1978
|PDF file||4.1 MB||
Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.
|Add to Cart||Paperback52 pages||$23.00||$18.40 20% Web Discount|
If it cost nothing to meter and bill customers for electricity use during peak and off-peak hours, time-of-day (TOD) pricing would improve the efficient use of resources and result in more equitable billing. Since new meters require added expense, the benefits — measured by changes in consumers' and producers' surplus — must be assessed. Based on data from the Los Angeles Electricity Rate Study, a 30-month experiment with 1800 households using either TOD, seasonal, or time-invariant electricity rates, this study found that the price elasticity of demand increased steadily with the total monthly use of electricity and that price responsiveness was much greater in households with certain appliances, e.g., those with swimming pools. TOD pricing could not be justified for the entire residential class on efficiency grounds, but a subset of customers displayed enough price responsiveness to offset the added metering costs.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Report series. The report was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 1993 that represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.