Evaluating Time-of-Day Electricity Rates for Residential Customers

by Jan Paul Acton, Bridger M. Mitchell


Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 1.8 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.


Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback49 pages $23.00 $18.40 20% Web Discount

If it cost nothing to meter and bill customers for electricity use during peak and off-peak hours, time-of-day (TOD) pricing would improve the efficient use of resources and result in more equitable billing. Since new meters require added expense, the benefits — measured by changes in consumers' and producers' surplus — must be assessed. Based on data from the Los Angeles Electricity Rate Study, a 30-month experiment with 1800 households using either TOD, seasonal, or time-invariant electricity rates, this study found that the price elasticity of demand increased steadily with the total monthly use of electricity and that price responsiveness was much greater in households with certain appliances, e.g., those with swimming pools. TOD pricing could not be justified for the entire residential class on efficiency grounds, but a subset of customers displayed enough price responsiveness to offset the added metering costs.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation report series. The report was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 1993 that represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.

Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.