Policy and program planning in the Department of Energy
ResearchPublished 1980
Examines the Department of Energy's (DOE) Policy and Program Planning System (PPPS) in DOE's first year, describes changes in the second year, analyzes PPPS's failure to operate as intended, and suggests guidelines for a new planning system. Intended to help establish DOE policies, assure that programs follow these policies, and integrate other planning efforts, PPPS failed to operate as intended because of a difficult operating environment, lack of attention from key DOE actors, excessive complexity, and insufficient resources. The process should concentrate on a few key issues, generate alternatives, provide disinterested evaluation of program proposals, develop guidance for the programs, and encourage expression of the diverse points of view existing in DOE. The report proposes a simplified process stressing an analytic agenda to guide policy analysis and research.
Document Details
- Copyright: RAND Corporation
- Availability: Web Only
- Year: 1980
- Pages: 104
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.7249/pubs
- Document Number: R-2537-DOE
Citation
RAND Style Manual
Chicago Manual of Style
This publication is part of the RAND report series. The report series, a product of RAND from 1948 to 1993, represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.