Findings from a review of how technical and nontechnical factors influence the perception and regulation of risks from technological activities. It is found that (1) society has not been able to quantify risk acceptance criteria that are generally acceptable and applicable to all forms of risk, (2) different regulatory bodies (and their members) seek to attain different risk-reduction goals, even for identical risks, and (3) the acceptability of energy technologies varies significantly as a function of the risk-reduction goals used. The report concludes that regulatory agencies should explicitly recognize and consider the effects of the goals they adopt. They must be self-aware in specifying risk-reduction goals, must relate them to other relevant goals, and must understand their implications for the choice of energy alternatives.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Report series. The report was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 1993 that represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.