Some Interim Results from a Controlled Trial of Cost Sharing in Health Insurance
ResearchPublished 1982
ResearchPublished 1982
7,706 persons are participating in a controlled trial of alternative health insurance policies. Interim results indicate that persons fully covered for medical services spend around 50 percent more than similar persons insured with an income-related catastrophic plan. Full coverage leads to more people using services and increased hospital admissions. Once patients are admitted to the hospital, however, expenditure per person does not differ significantly among the experimental insurance plans. Hospital admissions for children also do not vary by insurance plan. The income-related cost sharing in the experimental plans affects expenditure by different income groups similarly, but adults' total expenditure varies more than children's. Sufficient data are not yet available on whether higher utilization by those with free care reflects overutilization, or whether lower utilization by those with income-related catastrophic coverage reflects underutilization. Both may well be true.
This publication is part of the RAND report series. The report series, a product of RAND from 1948 to 1993, represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.