Oil Shale in the Piceance Basin

An Analysis of Land Use Issues

by David Rubenson, Richard Y. Pei

Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 2.9 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

Many institutional, environmental, and technical issues will affect development of the U.S. oil shale resource. This report addresses the issue of federal land use policies and their effect on (1) the amount of shale that can be recovered, (2) the recovery costs, and (3) the lead times required for industry expansion. Section II discusses federal and utilization policies and states the research questions in specific terms. Section III presents the analysis, the assumptions underlying it, and quantitative results. These are then discussed in Sec. IV, as are alternative land use policies and their relationship to other development factors.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Report series. The report was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 1993 that represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.

This research in the public interest was supported by RAND, using discretionary funds made possible by the generosity of RAND's donors, the fees earned on client-funded research, and independent research and development (IR&D) funds provided by the Department of Defense.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.