Regulating the Content and Volume of Litigation
An Economic Analysis
Download eBook for Free
|PDF file||1.4 MB||
Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.
Purchase Print Copy
|Add to Cart||Paperback26 pages||$20.00||$16.00 20% Web Discount|
In recent years, courts and legislatures have used rules that shift liability for court costs and attorneys' fees to plaintiffs or defendants to achieve two different objectives: to encourage litigation by particular plaintiffs (in civil rights, pollution, and consumer litigation), and to regulate the volume of litigation (most commonly to encourage settlement). These goals are contradictory and in conflict in a recent Supreme Court case, [Delta Air Lines, Inc. vs. August]. This essay discusses the distributive effects of these rules and their effects on the rate of litigation. The analysis expands other recent treatments by considering offer-of-judgment rules and the parties' strategic actions.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Report series. The report was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 1993 that represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.