Full Document

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 2.6 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.


Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback88 pages $25.00 $20.00 20% Web Discount

Describes a prototype version of the tactical air target recommender (TATR), an "expert system" developed at RAND to help tactical air targeteers select and prioritize airfields and target elements on those air fields. Under the interactive direction of a user, TATR can preferentially order enemy airfields, determine targets to attack on those airfields, and identify weapon systems that are effective against those targets. Its primary functions are to provide an attack plan and to project the results of implementing that plan. It applies predetermined heuristics to generate an initial plan, which can then be modified by the user. By projecting plan results over a series of days, TATR can assist the user in deciding on the best plan to implement. The program also interactively maintains and updates its databases and provides detailed information on plans, friendly force capability, and enemy force posture and status. TATR is programmed in the ROSIE programming language. Earlier versions of TATR were reported in N-1645 and N-1796.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Report series. The report was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 1993 that represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.

Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.