Response to Time-of-Day Electricity Rates by Large Business Customers

Reconciling Conflicting Evidence

Jan Paul Acton, Rolla Edward Park

ResearchPublished 1987

This report attempts to reconcile the conflicting evidence regarding the effect of time-of-day (TOD) rates on business customers' electricity usage. The authors describe the apparent conflict among different studies of customer response; summarize five of the most important of the structured econometric studies of U.S. customer response; present new findings based on RAND data covering ten U.S. utilities and approximately 4,000 customers on TOD rates; and report new load-shape analysis of U.S. data. The findings suggest that TOD rates do lead to statistically significant changes in electricity use among U.S. commercial and industrial firms, but the degree of change is much more modest than some early studies suggest. The primary reason for overestimation of response is that some studies used samples of firms that are unrepresentative of the business class as a whole. In addition, some analytic methods are unsuited to estimation when the true response is very small.

Order a Print Copy

Format
Paperback
Page count
72 pages
List Price
$25.00
Buy link
Add to Cart

Document Details

  • Availability: Available
  • Year: 1987
  • Print Format: Paperback
  • Paperback Pages: 72
  • Paperback Price: $25.00
  • Paperback ISBN/EAN: 978-0-8330-0825-1
  • Document Number: R-3477-NSF

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Acton, Jan Paul and Rolla Edward Park, Response to Time-of-Day Electricity Rates by Large Business Customers: Reconciling Conflicting Evidence, RAND Corporation, R-3477-NSF, 1987. As of September 15, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/reports/R3477.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Acton, Jan Paul and Rolla Edward Park, Response to Time-of-Day Electricity Rates by Large Business Customers: Reconciling Conflicting Evidence. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1987. https://www.rand.org/pubs/reports/R3477.html. Also available in print form.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND report series. The report series, a product of RAND from 1948 to 1993, represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.