Telephone Assistance Programs for Low-Income Households: A Preliminary Assessment
Jan 1, 1988
|PDF file||1.9 MB||
Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.
|Add to Cart||Paperback63 pages||$20.00||$16.00 20% Web Discount|
This report describes an economic assessment of several different ways of trying to maintain universal telephone service in the face of increasing local telephone rates. The assessment is based on a simulation model that describes households and models the choice among optional tariffs. The simulation model is calibrated using recent empirical estimates of telephone demands and costs. The simulations compare various tariffs — including flat rates, mandatory measured rates, optional measured rates, and income-targeted lifeline rates — in terms of their effects on telephone penetration, economic welfare, and consumer surplus. At current price levels, neither optional measured rates nor lifeline rates have much effect on telephone penetration, even among low-income households. At a doubled price level that may prevail in the future, however, adding a measured rate option to flat rates increases penetration among low-income households by about 3 percent; adding lifeline service adds another 5 or 6 percent. At either present or future price levels, lifeline rates result in substantial consumer surplus transfers from higher- to lower-income households, although adding measured rate and lifeline options has little effect on aggregate economic welfare.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Report series. The report was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 1993 that represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.