Combat Support Command, Control, and Communications (CSC3)
Robust Methods to Mitigate Communications Disruptions
ResearchPublished 1991
Robust Methods to Mitigate Communications Disruptions
ResearchPublished 1991
In contrast to the U.S. Air Force's traditional logistics doctrine of airbase self-sufficiency, a policy of mutual supply and maintenance support among similarly equipped combat bases introduces a need for a combat support command, control, and communications (CSC3) system as well as efficient inter-base transportation. This study investigates CSC3 requirements first by postulating an ideal system, then by examining the effect of communications delays and interruptions on combat capability. Workarounds to mitigate these degradations, such as daily exception reporting of only a few critical needs, are evaluated. Exception reporting, which only requires communications facilities of message caliber, proved almost as effective as full asset status reporting, which depends on data-grade, computer-to-computer communications. Consequently, CSC3 requirements for in-theater mutual support appear less demanding than was generally thought. The analysis also reconfirmed the importance of fast, assured inter-base transportation.
This publication is part of the RAND report series. The report series, a product of RAND from 1948 to 1993, represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.