Cover: The Fairness Debate in U.S.-Japan Economic Relations

The Fairness Debate in U.S.-Japan Economic Relations

Published 1991

by Roger W. Benjamin, Loren Yager, Michael Shires, Mark A. Peterson

Download

Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 2.8 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

Purchase

Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback71 pages $25.00

This report uses comparative material collected in Japan and the United States to assess the extent of fairness grievances, the relationship of these concerns to economic factors, and the ways in which the concerns are being addressed. The report also summarizes the main Japanese and American fairness concerns and arguments. The authors draw on four sources of information: a content analysis of major newspapers in Japan and the United States, litigation involving Japanese and American corporations, histories of disputes, and evidence on the most prevalent arguments of both sides. The newspaper content and litigation analyses indicate that unfairness grievances increased substantially throughout the 1980s. The U.S. bilateral trade deficit with Japan appears to be a necessary but not sufficient explanation of U.S. fairness grievances. Other factors — such as a trend toward disputes in high-technology industries and issues relating to foreign investment — appear to be increasing in importance. U.S. fairness grievances tend to be expressed as specific claims about economic matters, whereas Japanese fairness grievances emphasize American interference in their domestic politics and economy.

This report is part of the RAND report series. The report was a product of RAND from 1948 to 1993 that represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.