High School Vocational Education: Low Esteem, Little Clout
Jan 1, 1992
Academic and Vocational Tracking in Comprehensive High Schools
|PDF file||10.7 MB||
Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.
|Add to Cart||Paperback143 pages||$35.00||$28.00 20% Web Discount|
Reports the results of a study that compared three urban comprehensive senior high schools to better understand the rationale and processes that underlie schools' course offerings and students' coursetaking. All three schools made assumptions about their students that were related, in large part, to students' race and family socioeconomic status. An analysis of transcripts showed that low-income and disadvantaged minority students took more vocational courses, and that heavy vocational education participation was partially consistent with respondents' beliefs that such a program is best suited for students who are not expected to be successful in academic programs. Vocational programs are perceived negatively within the schools and are unlikely to receive school-level support or staff-development resources. The study recommends that schools press forward with experimentation and the evaluation of possibilities relating to a "strong" version of integrated academic and vocational education.
A Close Look at Schools and Students: Our Research Strategy
Curriculum Offerings and Student Assignments: Findings from Our Field Work
Who Takes Vocational Education? Findings from Student'S Transcripts
Who Takes College-Prep? Findings from Student Transcripts
An Eclectic Explanation of Matching Students to Curriculum
Additional Characteristics of the Class of 1988
Vocational Course Categories
Supplementary Tables on Vocational Participation
Methods and Results from the Logistic Analyses
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Report series. The report was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 1993 that represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.