Cover: The Soviet Army and the Communist Party:institutions in conflict.

The Soviet Army and the Communist Party:institutions in conflict.

Published 1966

by Roman Kolkowicz

Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback715 pages $120.00

An analysis of the conflict of ideas and interests between the two dominant institutions in the Soviet Union--the Communist Party and the military establishment--and its implications for future Soviet policy. Under Stalin, the Party, through an elaborate system of control and indoctrination, dominated the military. The power struggle that followed Stalin's death weakened the control mechanisms and strengthened the military's position. During the past twelve years, the officer corps has been progressively transformed from a group of relatively expendable commanders into a group of technocrats who are becoming increasingly indispensable to the maintenance of highly complex weapon systems. If the Soviet military assumes the more active role in Soviet politics that it is now in a position to take, it will probably emphasize defense needs at the expense of social planning. The military is likely to reappraise policies geared to detente and may well modify or abandon them.

This report is part of the RAND report series. The report was a product of RAND from 1948 to 1993 that represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.