Some Comparisons among the Prim-Read Firing Doctrine and Two Others Designed To Hedge against Leakage Attacks

by Kenneth Saunders

Download

Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 1.8 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

Purchase

Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback54 pages $23.00 $18.40 20% Web Discount

The ABM interceptor firing doctrines compared are the well-known Prim-Read and two others, designated MEKR and MEDUA; the latter two are specifically designed to hedge against leakage attacks, i.e., attacks that could cause sufficient damage to a target to satisfy an attacker's goals without his having to first exhaust the defender's interceptor stockpile. The model in all cases consists of an ABM system defending a single target under attack by ballistic missiles. The attacking missiles arrive sequentially and with such timing that the defense never engages two or more interceptors simultaneously. Previous comparisons among firing doctrines (including RM-5735) consider only cases in which a single penetrating weapon is required for target destruction. The emphasis in this report is on targets that cannot be destroyed by a single penetrating weapon. The major conclusion is that generally speaking, i.e., across a wide range of parameters, none of the three firing doctrines provides a significantly greater hedge against a leakage attack than the others.

Research conducted by

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Report series. The report was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 1993 that represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.