Comparisons of Soviet and U.S. Technology

by Robert L. Perry


Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 1.8 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.


Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback51 pages $20.00 $16.00 20% Web Discount

The military sector of Soviet R&D may be more efficient than the civilian sector; and in some respects, particularly in aircraft development, the Soviet military R&D system appears to be more efficient than U.S. military R&D. One consequence is that the USSR seems capable of generating more system options at lower costs and presumably with less risk than the United States in the present system acquisition environment. A second finding of this study is embodied in the demonstration that the extent of Soviet technological advancement can be ascertained for one specialized regime of military technology — turbine engines, in this instance — and the methodology developed in that demonstration can be applied to several areas of technology. Even if there is uncertainty about some of the underlying data, military goods, and services should be expressed in terms that uniformly reflect Soviet rather than U.S. manufacturing methods and input quantities.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Report series. The report was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 1993 that represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.

Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.