Class-Size Reduction in California: A Story of Hope, Promise, and Unintended Consequences

by Brian M. Stecher, George Bohrnstedt, Michael Kirst, Joan McRobbie, Trish Williams


Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price
Add to Cart Paperback5 pages Free

Although the overall impact of class-size reduction (CSR) in California will not be known for several years, much as been learned that can inform national discussion of the topic. In July 1996, the California legislative approved SB 1777, an education reform initiative that allocated over $1 billion annually to a CSR scheme. Optimism among legislators, educators, and parents that smaller classes would rapidly yield improved education standards higher scores among the state's K-3 students on standardized tests meant that California implemented CSR quickly and enthusiastically. The slight increases in performance reported since CSR came into effect have been costly, however, aggravating existing inequities within the state's education system. The writers discuss the history and status of CSR in California, its results, and the lessons it offers.

Originally published in: Phi Delta Kappan, v. 82, no. 9, May 2001, pp. 670-674.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Reprint series. The Reprint was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1992 to 2011 that represented previously published journal articles, book chapters, and reports with the permission of the publisher. RAND reprints were formally reviewed in accordance with the publisher's editorial policy and compliant with RAND's rigorous quality assurance standards for quality and objectivity. For select current RAND journal articles, see External Publications.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.