Lessons Learned During the Development of AH-64A APACHE Attack Helicopter

by Kenneth Amer, Raymond W. Prouty, G. J. Korkosz, Doug Fouse

Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price
Add to Cart Paperback18 pages Free

During the development of the AH-64A APACHE Attack Helicopter, several technical problems arose. This paper discusses the major difficulties encountered in the airframe, the weapons systems, and the avionics. The airframe challenges involved loads, dynamics, and controllability; the ordnance problems involved wear and accuracy; and the avionics problems involved crew interface. As each of these difficulties was encountered, various options were considered and the solution was selected, taking into consideration the tight time schedule between contract award and first flight, and between first flight and delivery to the customer. Other major considerations were structural integrity, performance, weight limitations and budget limitations.

Originally published in: Proceedings of the 48th Annual Forum of the American Helicopter Society, June 3-5, 1992, pp. 1-18.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Reprint series. The Reprint was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1992 to 2011 that represented previously published journal articles, book chapters, and reports with the permission of the publisher. RAND reprints were formally reviewed in accordance with the publisher's editorial policy and compliant with RAND's rigorous quality assurance standards for quality and objectivity. For select current RAND journal articles, see External Publications.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.