Cover: Pitfalls of Panel Data:  The Case of the SIPP Health Insurance Data

Pitfalls of Panel Data: The Case of the SIPP Health Insurance Data

Published 2004

by Jacob Alex Klerman

Purchase Print Copy

Add to Cart Paperback4 pages Free

Survey data are inevitably imperfect. First, finite budgets imply that we sample only a (very small) fraction of the population-- inducing sampling error. Second, and more pernicious, are a range of non-sampling errors. In simple cross-sectional surveys, among the important non-sampling errors are non-response bias (some people in the original sample are not found or refuse to respond) and recall bias (some people forget that events occurred or mid-date them). This paper, prepared for the session on "Longitudinal Data Systems," considers corresponding problems in longitudinal (or panel) survey efforts. Corresponding to non-response bias, there is panel attrition--some people who answer the first interview cannot be located or refuse to respond to some (or all) later interviews. Corresponding to recall bias, there is seam bias--when asked when events occurred, some people respond that their status changed immediately following their previous interview. Using the health insurance data from the Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP) as an example, this paper explores these two non-sampling error issues for panel data. It describes under what conditions the biases are likely to be important, proposes simple methods for identifying if the biases are present, suggests work-arounds for imperfect data, and sketches formal parametric methods for estimation in the presence of these longitudinal non-sampling biases.

Originally published in: Proceedings of the 1991 Public Health Conference on Records and Statistics : The 1990s, a Decade of Decisions for Vital and Health Statistics, July 15-17, 1991, pp. 36-39.

This report is part of the RAND reprint series. The Reprint was a product of RAND from 1992 to 2011 that represented previously published journal articles, book chapters, and reports with the permission of the publisher. RAND reprints were formally reviewed in accordance with the publisher's editorial policy and compliant with RAND's rigorous quality assurance standards for quality and objectivity. For select current RAND journal articles, see External Publications.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.