Unintended Consequences of Court Arbitration

A Cautionary Tale from New Jersey

by Robert J. MacCoun

Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price
Add to Cart Paperback22 pages Free

Arbitration programs appear to meet a demand for fair, adjudicative third-party hearings, but in doing so, they don't always improve court efficiency.

Originally published in: Justice System Journal, v. 14, no. 2, 1991, pp. 229-243, 251-256.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation reprint series. The Reprint was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1992 to 2011 that represented previously published journal articles, book chapters, and reports with the permission of the publisher. RAND reprints were formally reviewed in accordance with the publisher's editorial policy and compliant with RAND's rigorous quality assurance standards for quality and objectivity. For select current RAND journal articles, see External Publications.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.