Download Free Electronic Document

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 0.1 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

Background: Despite recommendations to use patient preferences for cost-effectiveness analyses and to guide treatment decisions, very little is known about how patients value their health.

Objectives: This study estimated the relative value to patients of physical, mental, and social health when making treatment decisions.

Methods: Data were gathered from 16,689 adult outpatients visiting 46 primary care clinics in managed care organizations in California, Texas, Minnesota, Maryland, and Colorado.

Measures: SF-12 health-related quality of life and patient preferences for their current health status as assessed by standard gamble and time trade-off utility methods.

Results: While physical health contributes substantially to patient preferences (35%-55% of the relative variance explained), patients also place an equally high value on their mental health (29%-42%), and almost one-quarter of the relative contribution is due to social health. The contribution of mental health to preferences is stronger in patients with chronic conditions.

Conclusions: Patient preferences, which should be driving treatment decisions, are strongly related to mental and social health, as well as physical health. Thus, medical practice should strive to balance concerns for all three health domains in making treatment decisions, and health care resources should target medical treatments that improve mental and social health outcomes.

Reprinted with permission from Journal of General Internal Medicine, Vol. 14, No. 6, 1999, pp. 357-363. Copyright © 1999 Society of General Internal Medicine.

Originally published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine, Vol. 14, No. 6, 1999, pp. 357-363.

This report is part of the RAND reprint series. The Reprint was a product of RAND from 1992 to 2011 that represented previously published journal articles, book chapters, and reports with the permission of the publisher. RAND reprints were formally reviewed in accordance with the publisher's editorial policy and compliant with RAND's rigorous quality assurance standards for quality and objectivity. For select current RAND journal articles, see External Publications.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.