U.S. policy and the Yugoslav crisis : implications for transatlantic relations
ResearchPublished 1994
This essay examines the impact of the Yugoslav crisis on U.S. relations with Europe. The first section reviews the evolution of U.S. policy towards the Yugoslav crisis and the major factors which influenced that policy; the second examines the policy divergences between the United States and its West European allies that were created by the crisis; the third deals with recent U.S. policies and the final one focuses on the broader implications of the crisis for U.S.-European relations.
Document Details
- Copyright: RAND Corporation
- Availability: Web Only
- Year: 1994
- Pages: 18
- Document Number: RP-348
Research conducted by
Originally published in: The Implications of the Yugoslav Crisis for Western Europe's Foreign Relations, M. Jopp, ed., Paris, WEU Institute for Security Studies, October 1994, pp. 17-34.
This publication is part of the RAND reprint series. The reprint series, a product of RAND from 1992 to 2011, included previously published journal articles, book chapters, and reports that were reproduced by RAND with the permission of the publisher. RAND reprints were formally reviewed in accordance with the publisher's editorial policy and compliant with RAND's rigorous quality assurance standards for quality and objectivity. For select current RAND journal articles, see external publications.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.