Areal and socioeconomic differentials in infant and child mortality in Cameroon

Barthelemy Kuate Defo

ResearchPublished 1996

Given its geographical, socioeconomic, ethnic, and cultural diversity, Cameroon offers an excellent setting for investigating the contribution of geographical and socioeconomic factors to mortality differences in infancy and childhood. Such research is crucial for designing appropriate health policies at the national and regional levels. Using data from a nationally representative sample of more than 12,000 births, this study assesses infant and child mortality differences in Cameroon by residence area, mother's education, ethnicity, marital status and union type, religion, and the interplay of those factors on differential mortality. The most vulnerable groups of children in the country are rural residents; residents of the East, North, and South-West regions; Kaka-Baya and Fulbe-Fulani children; and children whose mothers have no education, are Traditionalist, are unmarried, or are in polygamous unions. Lack of maternal schooling alone explains all the excess childhood mortality of Fulbe-Fulani children, most of the excess mortality of children of the North and East regions, most of the excess mortality of the countryside vis-a-vis the metropolitan areas of Yaounde and Douala, and most of the excess mortality of children of Traditionalists. The robustness of the excess neonatal mortality of newborns in the East region probably reflects the higher prevalence of tetanus in that region compared to the rest of the country. The study also suggests that the place/region of residence in Cameroon is likely to be a proxy for inequalities in the provision of and/or use of health services.

Order a Print Copy

Format
Paperback
Page count
22 pages
List Price
Free
Buy link
Add to Cart

Topics

Document Details

  • Availability: Available
  • Year: 1996
  • Print Format: Paperback
  • Paperback Pages: 22
  • List Price: Free
  • Document Number: RP-498

Originally published in: Social Science and Medicine, v. 42, no. 3, 1996, pp. 399-420.

This publication is part of the RAND reprint series. The reprint series, a product of RAND from 1992 to 2011, included previously published journal articles, book chapters, and reports that were reproduced by RAND with the permission of the publisher. RAND reprints were formally reviewed in accordance with the publisher's editorial policy and compliant with RAND's rigorous quality assurance standards for quality and objectivity. For select current RAND journal articles, see external publications.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.