Areal and socioeconomic differentials in infant and child mortality in Cameroon

by Barthelemy Kuate Defo


Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price
Add to Cart Paperback22 pages Free

Given its geographical, socioeconomic, ethnic, and cultural diversity, Cameroon offers an excellent setting for investigating the contribution of geographical and socioeconomic factors to mortality differences in infancy and childhood. Such research is crucial for designing appropriate health policies at the national and regional levels. Using data from a nationally representative sample of more than 12,000 births, this study assesses infant and child mortality differences in Cameroon by residence area, mother's education, ethnicity, marital status and union type, religion, and the interplay of those factors on differential mortality. The most vulnerable groups of children in the country are rural residents; residents of the East, North, and South-West regions; Kaka-Baya and Fulbe-Fulani children; and children whose mothers have no education, are Traditionalist, are unmarried, or are in polygamous unions. Lack of maternal schooling alone explains all the excess childhood mortality of Fulbe-Fulani children, most of the excess mortality of children of the North and East regions, most of the excess mortality of the countryside vis-a-vis the metropolitan areas of Yaounde and Douala, and most of the excess mortality of children of Traditionalists. The robustness of the excess neonatal mortality of newborns in the East region probably reflects the higher prevalence of tetanus in that region compared to the rest of the country. The study also suggests that the place/region of residence in Cameroon is likely to be a proxy for inequalities in the provision of and/or use of health services.

Originally published in: Social Science and Medicine, v. 42, no. 3, 1996, pp. 399-420.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Reprint series. The Reprint was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1992 to 2011 that represented previously published journal articles, book chapters, and reports with the permission of the publisher. RAND reprints were formally reviewed in accordance with the publisher's editorial policy and compliant with RAND's rigorous quality assurance standards for quality and objectivity. For select current RAND journal articles, see External Publications.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.