Cover: Insights into heaping from retrospective breastfeeding data

Insights into heaping from retrospective breastfeeding data

Published 1996

by Jacob Alex Klerman

Purchase Print Copy

Add to Cart Paperback6 pages Free

Recall bias is a pervasive problem in the analysis of retrospective data (Shyrock et al., 1973; Ewbank, 1981). The problem is a recurrent concern in the literature on the determinants of breastfeeding duration, its trend over time, and the effect of breastfeeding on infant mortality (e.g., Knodel and Debavalya, 1980; Diamond, McDonald, and Shah, 1986). Much of the concern is stimulated by "heaping" - the pronounced spikes at 12, 24, and 36 months in the retrospective breastfeeding data. Previous research on the nature and effects of recall bias has been hampered by the lack of data that would make it possible to distinguish heaping in the recall process from heaping in the true behavior, and the lack of data that would allow inference of the true behavior underlying the heaped responses. In the absence of such data, previous analyses have made strong (and, as the author will show, incorrect) assumptions or have analyzed only the current status data. This paper exploits unique data from the Malaysian Family Life Surveys (MFLS) to reexamine the nature, correlates, and consequences of heaping and other forms of recall bias for the analysis of durations of breastfeeding with hazard models. Together, MFLS-1 in 1976 and MFLS-2 in 1988 record retrospective breastfeeding durations for over 11,000 infants, including two responses (separated by 12 years) for over 3,000 of them.

Originally published in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Survey Measurement and Process Quality, Bristol, United Kingdom, April 1-4, 1995, pp. 239-244.

This report is part of the RAND reprint series. The Reprint was a product of RAND from 1992 to 2011 that represented previously published journal articles, book chapters, and reports with the permission of the publisher. RAND reprints were formally reviewed in accordance with the publisher's editorial policy and compliant with RAND's rigorous quality assurance standards for quality and objectivity. For select current RAND journal articles, see External Publications.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.