The comparative costs of allowing consumer choice for auto insurance in all fifty states

by Jeffrey O'Connell, Stephen J. Carroll, Michael Horowitz, Allan Abrahamse, Lewis Jamison, Paul F. Jamieson

Purchase

Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price
Add to Cart Paperback63 pages Free

This article presents actuarial results for all fifty states, including those currently with no-fault laws, focusing on the effects of the plan allowing choice (to give up tort claims for noneconomic loss) on the costs of personal, that is, private passenger, auto insurance. The authors first estimate what auto insurers would have to charge the average insured motorist to recover the costs incurred in compensating accident victims under all coverages and limits under the status quo. They also estimate separately the costs of those buying only mandatory coverages and limits. The authors then develop corresponding estimates for motorists who elect to retain the status quo and for motorists who switch to the new plan allowing choice. Next, these estimates are compared to determine how the adoption of the plan allowing choice would affect the costs of auto insurance, depending on whether motorists stay or switch, and whether they buy more than mandatory coverages. Savings on the order of 20 to 40 percent would be attained in almost every state, which would translate into about half that percentage savings in total auto premiums, including the premium components for both personal injury and all car damage.

Originally published in: Maryland Law Review, v. 55, no. 1, 1996, pp. 160-222.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Reprint series. The Reprint was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1992 to 2011 that represented previously published journal articles, book chapters, and reports with the permission of the publisher. RAND reprints were formally reviewed in accordance with the publisher's editorial policy and compliant with RAND's rigorous quality assurance standards for quality and objectivity. For select current RAND journal articles, see External Publications.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/research-integrity.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.