Cover: The comparative costs of allowing consumer choice for auto insurance in all fifty states

The comparative costs of allowing consumer choice for auto insurance in all fifty states

Published 1996

by Jeffrey O'Connell, Stephen J. Carroll, Michael Horowitz, Allan Abrahamse, Lewis Jamison, Paul F. Jamieson

Purchase Print Copy

Add to Cart Paperback63 pages Free

This article presents actuarial results for all fifty states, including those currently with no-fault laws, focusing on the effects of the plan allowing choice (to give up tort claims for noneconomic loss) on the costs of personal, that is, private passenger, auto insurance. The authors first estimate what auto insurers would have to charge the average insured motorist to recover the costs incurred in compensating accident victims under all coverages and limits under the status quo. They also estimate separately the costs of those buying only mandatory coverages and limits. The authors then develop corresponding estimates for motorists who elect to retain the status quo and for motorists who switch to the new plan allowing choice. Next, these estimates are compared to determine how the adoption of the plan allowing choice would affect the costs of auto insurance, depending on whether motorists stay or switch, and whether they buy more than mandatory coverages. Savings on the order of 20 to 40 percent would be attained in almost every state, which would translate into about half that percentage savings in total auto premiums, including the premium components for both personal injury and all car damage.

Originally published in: Maryland Law Review, v. 55, no. 1, 1996, pp. 160-222.

This report is part of the RAND reprint series. The Reprint was a product of RAND from 1992 to 2011 that represented previously published journal articles, book chapters, and reports with the permission of the publisher. RAND reprints were formally reviewed in accordance with the publisher's editorial policy and compliant with RAND's rigorous quality assurance standards for quality and objectivity. For select current RAND journal articles, see External Publications.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.