Detracking America's schools : the reform without cost?

Dominic J. Brewer, D. I. Rees, L. M. Argys

ResearchPublished 1996

Using data from the National Center for Education Statistics, the authors examined the effect of tracking on the mathematics achievement of 3,900 tenth graders. They found that tracking affects test scores: Higher-track students (who receive more educational resources, e.g., more-experienced teachers) performed better than would be predicted if they had been assigned to a heterogeneous class. Placement in a lower track was associated with a decrease; placement in an average class with a small increase. Thus, although students in the lower tracks would realize achievement gains in a heterogeneous class, this gain would be at the expense of higher-track students. These results raise a fundamental dilemma for educators and policymakers grappling with ways to improve the nation's schools. Whether to detrack, then, depends on how our society weighs the competing notions of equity and efficiency.

Order a Print Copy

Format
Paperback
Page count
9 pages
List Price
Free
Buy link
Add to Cart

Topics

Document Details

  • Availability: Available
  • Year: 1996
  • Print Format: Paperback
  • Paperback Pages: 9
  • List Price: Free
  • Document Number: RP-523

Originally published in: Phi Delta Kappan, v. 77, no. 3, November 1995 and v. 77, no. 6, February 1996, pp. 210-215, 442-444.

This publication is part of the RAND reprint series. The reprint series, a product of RAND from 1992 to 2011, included previously published journal articles, book chapters, and reports that were reproduced by RAND with the permission of the publisher. RAND reprints were formally reviewed in accordance with the publisher's editorial policy and compliant with RAND's rigorous quality assurance standards for quality and objectivity. For select current RAND journal articles, see external publications.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.