Cover: Tracking in the United States : descriptive statistics from NELS

Tracking in the United States : descriptive statistics from NELS

Published 1996

by D. I. Rees, L. M. Argys, Dominic J. Brewer

Purchase Print Copy

Add to Cart Paperback7 pages Free

Although there is a general sense among education researchers that the practice of ability grouping is widespread, national descriptive statistics on the subject is scarce. This note presents data from the National Educational Longitudinal Study of 1988 that suggest a sizeable majority of 8th and 10th grade students are tracked. Also, it is found that informal tracking patterns in the 8th grade and 10th grade seem to be broadly similar. Lastly, the authors note that students from low socioeconomic backgrounds, blacks, and Hispanics are more likely to be enrolled in lower track classes and less likely to be in upper track classes.

Originally published in: Economics of Education Review, v. 15, no. 1, 1995, pp. 83-89.

This report is part of the RAND reprint series. The Reprint was a product of RAND from 1992 to 2011 that represented previously published journal articles, book chapters, and reports with the permission of the publisher. RAND reprints were formally reviewed in accordance with the publisher's editorial policy and compliant with RAND's rigorous quality assurance standards for quality and objectivity. For select current RAND journal articles, see External Publications.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.