Phase II of the AHCPR-Sponsored Heart Failure Guideline

Translating Practice Recommendations into Review Criteria

by David Hadorn, David P. Baker, Caren Kamberg, Robert H. Brook

Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price
Add to Cart Paperback12 pages Free

In 1992, under the sponsorship of the U.S. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, RAND assembled an expert panel to develop the Heart Failure Clinical Practice Guideline. Phase II of the effort was intended to identify which of the guideline's recommendations the panel felt were suitable for use in retrospective utilization review and quality assessment programs and to develop review criteria, performance measures, and standards of quality for use in monitoring compliance with those recommendations. Selecting guideline recommendations for translation into review criteria and ultimately into standards of care was a multi-step process comprising (1) identification of 34 recommendations from the guideline; (2) rating them on the basis of importance to quality of care and feasibility of monitoring; (3) review by a subcommittee and the full guideline panel; (4) translation into review criteria; and (5) further review and input by panelists and peer and pilot reviewers. Finally, standards of care (the minimum proportion of cases expected to be in accordance with guideline recommendations) were determined to be 90%-95% for six of the final criteria and 75%-80% for the other two. Despite some reservations, physicians and other health care professionals agreed to be held accountable for following a core set of guideline recommendations for the treatment of heart failure. Substantial progress was made in identifying recommendations that panelists and reviewers were willing to endorse in utilization review activities, including adoption of improved documentation standards. The review criteria's major impact may be the knowledge that the criteria are in place and that care is being monitored based on those standards.

Originally published in: The Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement, v. 22, no. 4, April 1996, pp. 265-276.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation reprint series. The Reprint was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1992 to 2011 that represented previously published journal articles, book chapters, and reports with the permission of the publisher. RAND reprints were formally reviewed in accordance with the publisher's editorial policy and compliant with RAND's rigorous quality assurance standards for quality and objectivity. For select current RAND journal articles, see External Publications.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.