Assessing armed forces' deficiencies for peace operations : a methodology

by Thomas S. Szayna, Preston Niblack, William O'Malley

Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price
Add to Cart Paperback15 pages Free

Increasing the availability and effectiveness of forces from some of the developing countries for peace operations is an important way of ensuring the success of such missions in the future. In practice, this means structuring aid and assistance programmes from developed Western states to developing states in an appropriate fashion. The first step is to assess the deficiencies of the armed forces specifically with respect to peace operations. The authors propose a methodology for such an assessment. This uses seven categories to identify obstacles to the more effective participation in peace operations: general education, military proficiency, discipline, leadership, equipment, English-language proficiency, and specialized peacekeeping training. These measures, each a composite of several indicators, yield a general assessment. In line with the policy orientation of the article the authors then propose some ways in which to use this assessment.

Originally published in: International Peacekeeping, v. 3, no. 3, Autumn 1996, pp. 77-91.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Reprint series. The Reprint was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1992 to 2011 that represented previously published journal articles, book chapters, and reports with the permission of the publisher. RAND reprints were formally reviewed in accordance with the publisher's editorial policy and compliant with RAND's rigorous quality assurance standards for quality and objectivity. For select current RAND journal articles, see External Publications.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.