Just, Speedy, and Inexpensive?

James S. Kakalik

ResearchPublished 1997

This article summarizes RAND's evaluation of the Civil Justice Reform Act of 1990 (CJRA). The CJRA required each federal district court to develop a case management plan to reduce costs and delay. The legislation also created a pilot program to test six principles of case management, and required an independent evaluation to assess their effects. Study results appear in four volumes. MR-800-ICJ, the executive summary, describes the purpose of the CJRA, the basic design of the evaluation, the key findings, and their policy implications. MR-801-ICJ traces the implementation of the CJRA in the study districts. MR-802-ICJ presents the main descriptive and statistical findings related to cost, time to disposition, and participants' satisfaction and views of fairness. MR-803-ICJ describes the results of an evaluation of mediation and neutral evaluation designed to supplement the alternative dispute resolution assessment contained in the main CJRA evaluation.

Order a Print Copy

Format
Paperback
Page count
6 pages
List Price
Free
Buy link
Add to Cart

Topics

Document Details

  • Availability: Available
  • Year: 1997
  • Print Format: Paperback
  • Paperback Pages: 6
  • List Price: Free
  • Document Number: RP-635

Originally published in: Judicature, v. 80, no. 4, January-February 1997, pp. 184-189.

This publication is part of the RAND reprint series. The reprint series, a product of RAND from 1992 to 2011, included previously published journal articles, book chapters, and reports that were reproduced by RAND with the permission of the publisher. RAND reprints were formally reviewed in accordance with the publisher's editorial policy and compliant with RAND's rigorous quality assurance standards for quality and objectivity. For select current RAND journal articles, see external publications.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.