Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price
Add to Cart Paperback14 pages Free

Two strains of debate over American air power have emerged since Desert Storm. Land warriors insist that the proper role of air power remains the support of surface operations and that only "boots on the ground" can assure military victory. Airmen counter that, thanks to stealth and precision attack capability, air power can do the bulk of work needed to determine war outcomes, enabling other force elements to achieve their goals with minimum loss of life. Insofar as that argument has merit, it suggests that the primary role of land power may now be increasingly to secure a win rather than to achieve it, at least in the most stressful situations of high-intensity conflict. It also suggests that the air assets of all services, in appropriate combination, now command a strong presumption of being the tool of choice as the supported rather than the supporting combat element.

Research conducted by

Originally published in: Strategic Review, v. 25, no. 4, pp. 42-55.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation reprint series. The Reprint was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1992 to 2011 that represented previously published journal articles, book chapters, and reports with the permission of the publisher. RAND reprints were formally reviewed in accordance with the publisher's editorial policy and compliant with RAND's rigorous quality assurance standards for quality and objectivity. For select current RAND journal articles, see External Publications.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.