Are mandatory minimum drug sentences cost-effective?
This article summarizes the results and implications of a recent study of the cost-effectiveness of mandatory minimum drug sentences. Mandatory minimum sentences are not as cost-effective as spending additional resources on either enforcement without mandatory minimums or on drug treatment for heavy drug users. Long sentences should be reserved for certain types of very high-level drug dealers.
Originally published in: Corrections Management Quarterly, v. 2, no. 1, 1998, pp. 62-73.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Reprint series. The Reprint was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1992 to 2011 that represented previously published journal articles, book chapters, and reports with the permission of the publisher. RAND reprints were formally reviewed in accordance with the publisher's editorial policy and compliant with RAND's rigorous quality assurance standards for quality and objectivity. For select current RAND journal articles, see External Publications.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.