Cover: Labor Supply Effects of State Maternity Leave Legislation

Labor Supply Effects of State Maternity Leave Legislation

Published 1998

by Jacob Alex Klerman, Arleen Leibowitz

Purchase Print Copy

Add to Cart Paperback27 pages Free

This paper develops a theory of the labor supply effects of maternity leaves statutes. The theory predicts that both employment and leave will increase with the passage of maternity leave legislation, but the direction of the legislation's effect on work is ambiguous. The authors test these hypotheses using data from the 1980 and 1990 censuses. The results are sensitive to the controls for state and year effects and the controls for the characteristics of sampled women. The estimate provides some evidence that maternity leave statutes increased leave, but had insignificant positive effects on employment and work.

Originally published in: Gender and Family Issues in the Workplace, Francine D. Blau and Ronald G. Ehrenberg, eds., pp. 65-91.

This report is part of the RAND reprint series. The Reprint was a product of RAND from 1992 to 2011 that represented previously published journal articles, book chapters, and reports with the permission of the publisher. RAND reprints were formally reviewed in accordance with the publisher's editorial policy and compliant with RAND's rigorous quality assurance standards for quality and objectivity. For select current RAND journal articles, see External Publications.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.